If you’d like to see what Canadian bloggers are saying about the sponsorship scandal, head over to BlogsCanada’s group political blog.
Lots of posts up, including some good political cartoons by John Fewings.
It is rare to see a member of the governing party leave it.
Although some former Progressive Conservatives ‘crossed the floor’ in the recent merge, it’s unusual to see this. Liberal MP John Bryden quit his party today because wants the ‘idealism’ back that ‘motivated’ him as a back bencher Liberal.
Bryden, 60, represents the riding of Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough-Aldershot near Hamilton. He sat on the Commons public accounts committee which is reviewing the spending of the sponsorship scandal. Watching denominations fight is becoming a regular pastime.
The Conservative Party was caught a bit off guard.
Isn’t 60 a bit old for political idealism?
Seeing Paul Martin ‘outraged’ on the CBC this weekend didn’t cut it.
Martin has wanted the PM’s job since he cut his baby teeth. I understand the scrambling in Ottawa. This is a crisis and well it should be. So, Martin gets what he wants and gets sideswiped.
Spinning will probably take hold eventually, but we can hope Canadians see more than PR tactics, and demand the government be accountable.
I find what Pierre Bourque has to say interesting…
The governing Liberal Party is nothing, if not pragmatic. Its one and only reason for existence is to govern. Period. Leaders, as a recent succession of leaders have sadly found out along the way, come second … unless they are potential winners at the ballot box. Bourque can reveal that, as the Party continues to free-fall (internal party numbers now show the Libs at 30%), a growing number of disgruntled Liberals, already unhappy with their leader for a variety of reasons (Chretien/Copps/Rock supporters, still-on-backbench Martinites, sponsorship-shocked trench warriors, ordinary members disgusted by the $1/6 Billion CSL scandal, etc), have begun pondering the imponderable: if not Martin, then who to lead the party into the next election ? The basic issue is this: Martin is a one-trick pony, integrity. If he loses that, he loses the party. A critical mass is forming around the shocking notion that the incumbent leader is a lame duck who will have to go before the next election. Developing …
Paying the Price
According the the Vanier Institute of the Family’s fifth annual report, economic growth has been hard on families.
The study says Canadian household spending has increased an average of 17.4 per cent in the past 15 years.
Disposable incomes have risen only 2.9 per cent in the same period, contributing to a 35 per cent surge in their debts.
And the bulk of that spending is not on luxury items, but on high-priced necessities including electricity, and insurance, tuition and user fees.
82% of families with children have two income earners and 83% of single mothers work.
Poverty law experts have been saying for quite some time now that the cost of living has gone up 7 percent the past fifteen years, while minimum wage has gone up 2 percent.
The full report can be found here.
Baptists
Too be perfectly honest I don’t understand the differences in Baptists. I just know there are a lot of different kinds of them. I know some Independent Baptists are kind of ‘out there’, and I think Southern Baptists wield a fair bit of political power. Some of their churches down south look expensive.
I see this story is starting to make the mainstream media in the US.
The Southern Baptists want to leave a group of world-wide Baptists and take the piggy bank with them.
The executive committee of the Southern Baptist Convention voted Tuesday to withdraw from the Baptist World Alliance, saying it has become too liberal and advocates “aberrant and dangerous theologies.”
The Anglicans are battling and splitting, the US Catholic church is still reeling, and I suspect we’ll be hearing more about Baptists in the days ahead.
“We want to underscore that our departure is not intended to cast aspersion upon the many godly and enthusiastically evangelical Baptist fellowships that are members” of the Alliance, said Morris H. Chapman, president of the convention’s executive committee.
Nevertheless, a task force report in December claimed the Alliance showed a “decided anti-American tone.”
The report also said the Alliance promoted women as pastors, frequently criticized the Southern Baptist Convention international missions board, refused to talk openly about abortion and funded “questionable enterprises.”
I counted 190 churches in the Canadian Southern Baptist directory.
The Baptist World Alliance was founded in 1905.
Well. Ok. I know a few more things about Baptists than I did five minutes ago.

You are currently browsing the Bene Diction Blogs On weblog archives.
For blog design, Wordpress or MovableType coding or blog consulting, see cre8d design.
I wonder if any of the Conservatives that crossed the floor are second guessing that decision in light of the sponsorship scandal?
They wanted to be on a winning team. I wonder if they are too.
I don’t understand a lot about Baptists either and I am one.
The Baptist church in America has been going through some weird times ever since the ultra-conservative coup of the Southern Baptist Convention about 8-10 years ago (I forgot how long exactly). Once the fundamentalist faction took power, they began cleaning house in the denomination’s various schools and seminaries. A lot of good Bible scholars were fired from their positions for not toeing the line, and most of the seminaries controlled by the SBC…some of them good schools at one time…have had their best faculty removed and have been put under new leadership.
It doesn’t surprise me to see that they’re now looking to cut ties with the global Baptist church, but it’s still sad.
I track Independent Fundamental Baptists, which is about as nutty as Baptists get. (Wait, forget I said that. It’s not true. I’m sure there are nuttier Baptist churches out there.)
As far as I know, there are,
Free-will Baptists
Southern Baptists
Northern Baptists
American Baptists
Independent Baptists (Fundamentalist, also called IFB))
Primitive Baptists
Missionary Baptists
Greater Association of Regular Baptist Churches Baptist (GARBC)
Many of the Fundamentalists (IFB) would not consider ANY Southern Baptist to really be Fundamentalist, as simply being in the SBC implies a certain concession to compromise regarding the authority of the Scripture.
What I have found is that the word “Baptist” means simply that—people who believe that baptism by immersion plays a really significant role in the Christian life (regardless of the fact that the Apostle Paul himself declared he’d never baptize anybody again, as the whole issue was becoming a distraction from the Gospel).
Some people who tote around the name Baptist believe that baptism by immersion is actually essential for salvation. Others make it a requirement for church membership. They may not see itas a requirement for salvation, but they think it’s crucial for an obedient life.
The further south you go, in my experience, the less meaningful the term “Baptist” is. When I lived on the border of South Carolina and Georgia, there where churches with the name “Baptist” on the marquee who handled snakes, talked to spirits, and spoke in tongues. To a lot of people, “Baptist” is another way of saying, “We are the people who got it right, and the rest of you didn’t.” There are also “Baptist Briders,” who acknowledge that non-Baptists might be among he redeemed, but only Baptists make up the Bride of Christ.
Granted, the Southern Baptists seem the most conservative. The Independent Baptists SAY they are the most conservative, but the IFB church leadership is so disobedient to (or else so outright ignorant of) what they profess to believe that I don’t think that counts.
Anyway, as a person who is Fundamentalist by belief (ie, that the Bible is the sole authority for faith and practice, and is the inerrant Word of God) but not Baptist any more (Presbyterian! Hooray!), I don’t think it’s any more possible to define “Baptist” as it is to define “Christian.” The word means many things to many people.
I don’t know much about Baptists either, but I do know that the Southern Baptists are the only major denomination to revoke the ordination of women–that is, at one time they ordained women, then they decided it wasn’t right and revoked all ordinations.
Re: the sponsorship scandal
Calling them public servants is an oxymoron. Since when did “servants” do everything first class?