Cuba survived Hurricane Charlie, with no deaths reported. One man was killed in Jamacia as the tropical storm gained strength.
Florida has prepared to be hit today.
In China, in spite of the evacuation of nearly 1/2 million citizens in the patch of typhoon Rananim, 63 people are dead and over 1,800 are wounded.
The storm hit south of Shanghai and is the most powerful typhoon to hit the country in seven years. Winds were clocked at over 160km/h.
A British journalist has been kidnapped in Iraq.
James Brandon is a freelance reporter for the Sunday Telegraph, and is experienced in war reporting.
Using religion to sell a war
A researcher at the University of Washington has documented the US president’s public use of religious words since September 11, 2001.
David Domke looks at the media timeline of staying quiet and failing to challenge what he calls political fundamentalism. Domke has released a book called “God Willing?: Political Fundamentalism in the White House, the ‘War on Terror,’ and the Echoing Press.
As Bush makes his case for a second term, the research by David Domke documents how during his first term the president effectively linked religious terminology with political goals in the turbulent months after the Sept. 11 attacks.
In all but one of Bush’s 15 national addresses between 9/11 and the end of major combat in Iraq, for example, he cast the campaign against terrorism as a simple struggle of good (America) vs. evil, according to Domke’s book. And in four of the speeches, Bush issued explicit declarations that administration policies and goals were in line with divine powers.
Yet only two of the 326 post-speech editorials in 20 leading newspapers challenged the religiously derived notion of good vs. evil, and none questioned the president’s statements about God’s will.
There are institutes and blogs that monitor the use of religious-political fundamentalist language from Arab countries and the Middle East. Domke says the US media failed the public by uncritically echoing the message.
The coverage, Domke found, gave uncritical voice to four key fundamentalist messages from the administration:
1) Simplistic, black-and-white conceptions of the political landscape.
2) Calls for immediate action on administration policies as a necessary part of the nation’s “calling” and “mission” against terrorism.
3) Declarations about the will of God for America and for the spread of U.S. conceptions of freedom and liberty.
4) Claims that dissent from the administration was unpatriotic and a threat to the nation.
“These messages were rooted in a religiously conservative worldview,” Domke said, “yet they were often framed by both the administration and the news media to emphasize a sense of nationalism.
“That made the fundamentalist approach attractive, or at least palatable, to the press and public,” Domke added, “in a period when Americans were trying to understand what had happened and why.”
Keep quiet Canada
Canada’s Revenue Agency apparently called a meeting of various church and para-church leaders prior to our summer federal election and told them they risked losing their tax exempt status if they got involved in partisan political action.
Hello. CRA. Why not go after the several thousand fradulent charities in Canada that are a disgrace to us and the rest of the world?
And another thing. Canadians want civil discourse and respect shown during elections, but Ottawa, you really need to get a clue. Don’t push too hard Ottawa. Canadian citizens have ways of pushing back.
link via relapsed catholic
Athens
The Olympics begin today. If you like getting your information from a blog I recommend an international group effort out of Australia.
The world’s most popular search engine has carried on it’s tradition of marking special days with some whimsy.

You are currently browsing the Bene Diction Blogs On weblog archives.
For blog design, Wordpress or MovableType coding or blog consulting, see cre8d design.
And if you go over to the Green Man’s blog and check out his sidebar, you can see his official tally of Olympic Gold Metals, sorted by country.
He says it’s not likely to change much over the course of the games…
That is a riot!
I suspect somebody cares, but like him, I’m not really one of them.
I have some questions for that prof about his new book: Where did he get the idea that the phrase “good vs. evil” is “religiously derived”? I thought that was a universal theme. Good and evil themselves aren’t, y’know, purely religious in nature.
Furthermore, I’d like some evidence to back up his claim “that dissent from the administration was unpatriotic and a threat to the nation.”
I probably won’t be reading the book.
I don’t know that study this is much different than those that monitor tv shows for language etc.
Looking at the articles and review it appears to be the same kind of premise.
The words good-evil are universal and historical.
Good question. Are they religiously devised?
I don’t know their origin and use pre-AD.
There were good gods and evil gods.
I also can’t address domestic dissent and any informed historical comparisons. Blog on!
There is certainly religious speech on the terrorist side of the “war.” Sadly, most people seem to smooth over the fact that a holy war runs far deeper in the opposition than among the U.S. and its Western allies. I don’t think President Bush is wrong to use religious language at all in presenting the war, but he walks a fine and dangerous line. Bush is often careful to speak both of his own faith and the general faith of all religious people, especially including all monotheists. Do we really think Bush is so inclusive when it comes to the Muslim faith or is he just trying to avoid calling this an all-out holy war between Christians and Muslims?