<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counting words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/10/10/counting-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/10/10/counting-words/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/10/10/counting-words/#comment-3026</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 03:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ss75.shared.server-system.net/~benedictionblogson.com/?p=1012#comment-3026</guid>
		<description>It varies from election to election and the two major parties get to decide.  They also get to exclude minor parties, thus keeping them minor. The CPD is bi-partisan, not non-partisan.  &#62;:{
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It varies from election to election and the two major parties get to decide.  They also get to exclude minor parties, thus keeping them minor. The CPD is bi-partisan, not non-partisan.  &gt;:{</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bene Diction</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/10/10/counting-words/#comment-3025</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene Diction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ss75.shared.server-system.net/~benedictionblogson.com/?p=1012#comment-3025</guid>
		<description>Why three debates?
I can understand one, what is the reasoning for three?

In Canadian federal elections we have two debates with the four party leaders - one in French and one in English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why three debates?<br />
I can understand one, what is the reasoning for three?</p>
<p>In Canadian federal elections we have two debates with the four party leaders - one in French and one in English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/10/10/counting-words/#comment-3024</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2004 17:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ss75.shared.server-system.net/~benedictionblogson.com/?p=1012#comment-3024</guid>
		<description>Well, last night I watched Bush, Sr. and Dukakis debate and found both more appealing than the current pair.  Heck, I watched Kennedy vs. Nixon, and even Nixon was more appealing than Bush and Kerry.  *shudder*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, last night I watched Bush, Sr. and Dukakis debate and found both more appealing than the current pair.  Heck, I watched Kennedy vs. Nixon, and even Nixon was more appealing than Bush and Kerry.  *shudder*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bene Diction</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/10/10/counting-words/#comment-3023</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene Diction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2004 17:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ss75.shared.server-system.net/~benedictionblogson.com/?p=1012#comment-3023</guid>
		<description>I don't think either candidate is a clown.
I think political-speak doesn't come cheap.:^(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think either candidate is a clown.<br />
I think political-speak doesn&#8217;t come cheap.:^(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/10/10/counting-words/#comment-3022</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ss75.shared.server-system.net/~benedictionblogson.com/?p=1012#comment-3022</guid>
		<description>What'd I'd like to say is a phrase breakdown.  Both clowns resorted to slogan crutches a ridiculous number of times.  Some example:

"75% of al Quaeda"
"I have a plan"
"Wrong war, wrong place, wrong time"
"He can run, but he can't hide"
"90% of the casualities and 90% of the cost"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;d I&#8217;d like to say is a phrase breakdown.  Both clowns resorted to slogan crutches a ridiculous number of times.  Some example:</p>
<p>&#8220;75% of al Quaeda&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I have a plan&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Wrong war, wrong place, wrong time&#8221;<br />
&#8220;He can run, but he can&#8217;t hide&#8221;<br />
&#8220;90% of the casualities and 90% of the cost&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
