<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religion News Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/12/22/religion-news-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/12/22/religion-news-blog/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Therese Z</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/12/22/religion-news-blog/#comment-3429</link>
		<dc:creator>Therese Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ss75.shared.server-system.net/~benedictionblogson.com/?p=1136#comment-3429</guid>
		<description>That's a good question, to find one that covers all the Christian denominations, as well as Orthodox and Roman Catholicism.

For RC, I'd recommend Catholic Answers, www.catholic.com. It's very readable. Also the New Advent Encyclopedia, www.newadvent.com. It's pretty dry but golly it's complete.

Now you have me thinking about who's got the best complete one. I just know that the one who leaves RC to Ankerberg isn't the one..... 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good question, to find one that covers all the Christian denominations, as well as Orthodox and Roman Catholicism.</p>
<p>For RC, I&#8217;d recommend Catholic Answers, <a href="http://www.catholic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.catholic.com</a>. It&#8217;s very readable. Also the New Advent Encyclopedia, <a href="http://www.newadvent.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.newadvent.com</a>. It&#8217;s pretty dry but golly it&#8217;s complete.</p>
<p>Now you have me thinking about who&#8217;s got the best complete one. I just know that the one who leaves RC to Ankerberg isn&#8217;t the one&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bene Diction</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/12/22/religion-news-blog/#comment-3428</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene Diction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 05:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ss75.shared.server-system.net/~benedictionblogson.com/?p=1136#comment-3428</guid>
		<description>What apologetics site would you recommend Therese?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What apologetics site would you recommend Therese?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Therese Z</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2004/12/22/religion-news-blog/#comment-3427</link>
		<dc:creator>Therese Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2004 19:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ss75.shared.server-system.net/~benedictionblogson.com/?p=1136#comment-3427</guid>
		<description>An "apologetics" website that defines Catholicism as a cult? And uses a wildly inaccurate definition of the Church written by John Ankerberg, of all people? I wouldn't call it "the best apologetics site on the Internet."

Not scholarly, not careful in its fact-gathering, not hardly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An &#8220;apologetics&#8221; website that defines Catholicism as a cult? And uses a wildly inaccurate definition of the Church written by John Ankerberg, of all people? I wouldn&#8217;t call it &#8220;the best apologetics site on the Internet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not scholarly, not careful in its fact-gathering, not hardly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
