<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A response to the rhetoric of weblog marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2005/09/25/a-response-to-the-rhetoric-of-weblog-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2005/09/25/a-response-to-the-rhetoric-of-weblog-marketing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Coates</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2005/09/25/a-response-to-the-rhetoric-of-weblog-marketing/#comment-5070</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Coates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ss75.shared.server-system.net/~benedictionblogson.com/?p=1771#comment-5070</guid>
		<description>I think many people just find the whole idea of marketing actually slightly cynical now, but I think it's definitely more true in the case of marketing to and through webloggers. Messages spread well enough through that community, it's an environment where trusted word of mouth is pretty much the only currency. Marketing can't help but try to deform that environment one way or another. I've no doubt that it'll find a rhythm and space in that community, for good or ill, but I don't think this is it (or at least, if this is it, it's not the time for it).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many people just find the whole idea of marketing actually slightly cynical now, but I think it&#8217;s definitely more true in the case of marketing to and through webloggers. Messages spread well enough through that community, it&#8217;s an environment where trusted word of mouth is pretty much the only currency. Marketing can&#8217;t help but try to deform that environment one way or another. I&#8217;ve no doubt that it&#8217;ll find a rhythm and space in that community, for good or ill, but I don&#8217;t think this is it (or at least, if this is it, it&#8217;s not the time for it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh macleod</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2005/09/25/a-response-to-the-rhetoric-of-weblog-marketing/#comment-5069</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh macleod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ss75.shared.server-system.net/~benedictionblogson.com/?p=1771#comment-5069</guid>
		<description>The trouble here arises when you start speaking of "The Blogosphere" as one group of folk. There are all sorts of various agendae out there, and they're not all complimentary.

I dont think what I'm doing is particularly cynical. I'm a marketing blogger. I'm just using Stormhoek wine as a vehicle to prove a point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble here arises when you start speaking of &#8220;The Blogosphere&#8221; as one group of folk. There are all sorts of various agendae out there, and they&#8217;re not all complimentary.</p>
<p>I dont think what I&#8217;m doing is particularly cynical. I&#8217;m a marketing blogger. I&#8217;m just using Stormhoek wine as a vehicle to prove a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
