<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Federal cabinet and faith bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2006/02/06/the-federal-cabinet-and-faith-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2006/02/06/the-federal-cabinet-and-faith-bloggers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bene D</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2006/02/06/the-federal-cabinet-and-faith-bloggers/#comment-7060</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=2216#comment-7060</guid>
		<description>I see this as voter trust, my concerns aren't partisan.
 
After the caucus meeting yesterday the media cornered several conservative MP's and asked them about 'optics.' 

I don't think we need fancy political, marketing, or media language, were the voters of Vancouver Kingsway represented fairly?

Running a campaign on ethics sets expectations high, in Harpers win, perhaps too high. 
I don't think anyone needs a political degree or a  party membership to empathise with the voters of Vancouver Kingsway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this as voter trust, my concerns aren&#8217;t partisan.</p>
<p>After the caucus meeting yesterday the media cornered several conservative MP&#8217;s and asked them about &#8216;optics.&#8217; </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we need fancy political, marketing, or media language, were the voters of Vancouver Kingsway represented fairly?</p>
<p>Running a campaign on ethics sets expectations high, in Harpers win, perhaps too high.<br />
I don&#8217;t think anyone needs a political degree or a  party membership to empathise with the voters of Vancouver Kingsway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2006/02/06/the-federal-cabinet-and-faith-bloggers/#comment-7048</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=2216#comment-7048</guid>
		<description>I'm leaning more to the "hold another election &#38; see if you win the race as a conservative" point of view.  In our electoral system, it is difficult to distinguish between a "vote for the party" and a "vote for the candidate".   Has Emerson betrayed a trust placed in him by those voters who supported him?  Were they also voting for the larger platform of the Liberal party?  I suspect they were, and the honourable thing would be to resign and run again with Mr Harper's platform.

I think part of this has to do with a trust that is given to a public official by the voters, and how he honours that trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m leaning more to the &#8220;hold another election &amp; see if you win the race as a conservative&#8221; point of view.  In our electoral system, it is difficult to distinguish between a &#8220;vote for the party&#8221; and a &#8220;vote for the candidate&#8221;.   Has Emerson betrayed a trust placed in him by those voters who supported him?  Were they also voting for the larger platform of the Liberal party?  I suspect they were, and the honourable thing would be to resign and run again with Mr Harper&#8217;s platform.</p>
<p>I think part of this has to do with a trust that is given to a public official by the voters, and how he honours that trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bene D</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2006/02/06/the-federal-cabinet-and-faith-bloggers/#comment-7019</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 04:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=2216#comment-7019</guid>
		<description>Hi Jordon: You're off, thanks.:^)
Mark: This isn't about theology, it's about voters. You're on, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jordon: You&#8217;re off, thanks.:^)<br />
Mark: This isn&#8217;t about theology, it&#8217;s about voters. You&#8217;re on, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Byron</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2006/02/06/the-federal-cabinet-and-faith-bloggers/#comment-7017</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=2216#comment-7017</guid>
		<description>I did a piece on Emerson and the cabinet yesterday (you even left your C$0.02 on it); I'm not sure if you're counting non-Canadian faith blogs in your loop.

My thoughts aren't particuarly theological, either; I talked about Solberg's E-Free roots in passing, but wasn't thinking in a particularly scriptural tone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a piece on Emerson and the cabinet yesterday (you even left your C$0.02 on it); I&#8217;m not sure if you&#8217;re counting non-Canadian faith blogs in your loop.</p>
<p>My thoughts aren&#8217;t particuarly theological, either; I talked about Solberg&#8217;s E-Free roots in passing, but wasn&#8217;t thinking in a particularly scriptural tone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordon Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2006/02/06/the-federal-cabinet-and-faith-bloggers/#comment-7016</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordon Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=2216#comment-7016</guid>
		<description>BD, I would prefer if you took my weblog of the list of faith bloggers.  My thoughts are not any reflection of my faith or my denomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BD, I would prefer if you took my weblog of the list of faith bloggers.  My thoughts are not any reflection of my faith or my denomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherm</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2006/02/06/the-federal-cabinet-and-faith-bloggers/#comment-7008</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 18:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=2216#comment-7008</guid>
		<description>I sent the following email to &lt;a href="http://www2.vpl.vancouver.bc.ca/DBs/redbook/orgPgs/2/2666.html"&gt;David Emerson&lt;/a&gt;. You are right - he is still showing Liberal on his one site - the other one has been taken offline. Gee - wonder why.

Shame on you.

How can you, in good conscience run on a liberal platform and jump ship because you were offered a position of power?

You have undermined our democratic system and broken trust. It would be different if you were in office for a while and disagreed with your party platform.

You have let down your riding and the Canadian people. A re-election in your riding might be in order. Apparently you are a brilliant businessman. Right now though, many Canadians think your ethics are questionable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent the following email to <a href="http://www2.vpl.vancouver.bc.ca/DBs/redbook/orgPgs/2/2666.html">David Emerson</a>. You are right - he is still showing Liberal on his one site - the other one has been taken offline. Gee - wonder why.</p>
<p>Shame on you.</p>
<p>How can you, in good conscience run on a liberal platform and jump ship because you were offered a position of power?</p>
<p>You have undermined our democratic system and broken trust. It would be different if you were in office for a while and disagreed with your party platform.</p>
<p>You have let down your riding and the Canadian people. A re-election in your riding might be in order. Apparently you are a brilliant businessman. Right now though, many Canadians think your ethics are questionable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
