Comments on: Untangling communication

By: Drina

Drina — Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:51:24 +0000

Your posts don’t make very much sense. Can you elaborate?

By: dh

dh — Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:28:12 +0000

and they were definitely blinded by the either/or as well.

By: dh

dh — Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:27:47 +0000

They weren’t being simple concerning evil and wise concerning good.

By: Drina

Drina — Thu, 06 Apr 2006 03:17:26 +0000

[They were doing the work of Christ? I don’t know.]

Sounds about right

By: dh

dh — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:45:25 +0000

I agree in that CPT is in the blindness of either/or.

By: Bene D

Bene D — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 17:36:39 +0000

Saint: I did a bit of historical scratching regarding CPT’s theological roots, Quaker, Mennonite, Hitterite and Catholism etc., and I can’t pretend to understand. My brief research was confined to Canadian religious movements that came out of Europe.

There are people and beliefs with CPT I cannot dismiss or trivalize. It is strange non-violence is seen as treasonous and unGodly, but historical - and yeah, it is sad when we are in the blindness of either/or.

By: dh

dh — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 13:33:05 +0000

They were doing the work of Christ? I don’t know. “Be wise concerning good and simple concerning evil.”

By: Drina

Drina — Sun, 02 Apr 2006 01:33:58 +0000

They were doing the work of Christ. They should expect to be crucified, in the Western media and elsewhere.

By: saint

saint — Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:52:18 +0000

I have to admit that while I find the CPT a bit odd, I think they got crucified by the Western media.

Strange that such ardent non-violence is now considered strange.

By: dh

dh — Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:29:59 +0000

My take is the allegations are facts. dh