Charles Marsh is professor of religion and director of the Project on Lived Theology at the University of Virginia. This essay is adapted from his new book, “Wayward Christian Soldiers: Freeing the Gospel from Political Captivity” (Oxford).
God and Country (Boston Globe July 8, 2007) Subscription required
A few excerpts:
Why did American evangelicals not pause for a moment in the rush to war to consider the near-unanimous disapproval of the global Christian community? The worldwide Christian opposition seems to me the most neglected story related to the religious debate about Iraq: Despite approval for the president’s decision to go to war by 87 percent of white evangelicals in April 2003, according to a Pew Charitable Trusts poll, almost every Christian leader in the world (and almost every nonevangelical leader in the United States) voiced opposition to the war.
…
These past six years have been transformative in the religious history of the United States. It is arguably the passing of the evangelical moment — if not the end of evangelicalism’s cultural and political relevance, then certainly the loss of its theological credibility. Conservative evangelical elites, in exchange for political access and power, have ransacked the faith and trivialized its convictions. It is as though these Christians consider themselves to be recipients of a special revelation, as if God has whispered eternal secrets in their ears and summoned them to world-historic leadership in the present and future.
One thing, however, is clear: Any hope for renewal depends on the willingness to reach out to our brothers and sisters abroad.
…
The gospel has been humiliated because too many American Christians have decided that there are more important things to talk about. We would rather talk about our country, our values, our troops, and our way of life; and although we might think we are paying tribute to God when we speak of these other things, we are only flattering ourselves.
If only holiness were measured by the volume of our incessant chatter, we would be universally praised as the most holy nation on earth. But in our fretful, theatrical piety, we have come to mistake noisiness for holiness, and we have presumed to know, with a clarity and certitude that not even the angels dared claim, the divine will for the world. We have organized our needs with the confidence that God is on our side, now and always, whether we feed the poor or corral them into ghettos.
To a nation filled with intense religious fervor, the Hebrew prophet Amos said: You are not the holy people you imagine yourselves to be. Though the land is filled with festivals and assemblies, with songs and melodies, and with so much pious talk, these are not sounds and sights that are pleasing to the Lord. “Take away from me the noise of your congregations,” Amos says, “you who have turned justice into poison.”
An abbreviated version of Marsh’s God and Country essay here.
Published 1 year, 4 months ago
You are currently browsing the Bene Diction Blogs On weblog archives.
For blog design, Wordpress or MovableType coding or blog consulting, see cre8d design.
That verse from Amos is compelling - too often we try to do everything to please God, but we’re totally off the mark. And it’s not always easy to tell that we’re off, which is the frustrating part.
Smells like American Exceptionalism to me; the rest of the world thinks we’re doing it wrong, but we insist we’re the ones doing it right.
I’m not sure if he polled evangelical leaders in other countries; Catholic and modern mainline Protestant thought leans towards pacifism, or at least a very tight version of Just War that’s hard to meet. Evangelicals tend to be disorganized, so the big voices coming out of the rest of the Christian world will be the Catholics and mainliners, who have more centralized churches with leaders who can speak for their flock.
Is the less-than-stellar result in Iraq an indictment of God-and-country conservative evangelicals, like the folks at Porter Memorial a bit west of me in Lexington? Possibly, but the majority of American evangelicals aren’t card-carrying foreign policy neocons. Supportive of a right-of-center government and of the military, yes, but not in a knee-jerk way.
The first denomination I recall speaking up was Catholic.
Then The National Council of Churches, World Council of Churches and the list grew.
I agree, I don’t think the average American and the average US evangelical thinks about Iraq one way or the other.
It’s going to take a lot more deaths, a lot more deployments and time away from family and a lot more wounded before the government hears it’s citizens.
We’re wrestling with our military role in Afganistan, and not just on a political level. It wasn’t the six hearses on the 401, or the 16 cents on the dollar being spent on reconstruction, or NATO. It’s some of a lot of things.
It is quite an extraordinary statement and it would be interesting to see his data.
This may have been the Pew Trust report he referenced.
http://pewforum.org/events/index.php?EventID=49