<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Montebello - bootgate - police admit they were  &#8216;protesters&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/08/23/montebello-bootgate-police-admit-they-were-among-protesters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/08/23/montebello-bootgate-police-admit-they-were-among-protesters/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bene D</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/08/23/montebello-bootgate-police-admit-they-were-among-protesters/#comment-91734</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=3363#comment-91734</guid>
		<description>If I'm understanding correctly, the Green Zone was supposed to have been the family friendly area, best to ask someone who was there - here is an excellent photo essay blog.

http://yayacanada.blogspot.com/2007/08/montebello-village-under-seige.html

There are pictures of people sitting down getting shoved back.


Dr. Dawg: Police have already lied, they have their way of looking at protests, citizens have theirs.   If I'm understanding correctly, summit organizers were not happy the Council of Canadians chose to go to the perimiter fence with the petitions instead of just handing them over, I dont' have the source for that...

Sherm, I honestly don't know, given  inter-agency p***ing contests there would be  the usual tension, rivalry and territorialism police groups engage in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m understanding correctly, the Green Zone was supposed to have been the family friendly area, best to ask someone who was there - here is an excellent photo essay blog.</p>
<p><a href="http://yayacanada.blogspot.com/2007/08/montebello-village-under-seige.html" rel="nofollow">http://yayacanada.blogspot.com/2007/08/montebello-village-under-seige.html</a></p>
<p>There are pictures of people sitting down getting shoved back.</p>
<p>Dr. Dawg: Police have already lied, they have their way of looking at protests, citizens have theirs.   If I&#8217;m understanding correctly, summit organizers were not happy the Council of Canadians chose to go to the perimiter fence with the petitions instead of just handing them over, I dont&#8217; have the source for that&#8230;</p>
<p>Sherm, I honestly don&#8217;t know, given  inter-agency p***ing contests there would be  the usual tension, rivalry and territorialism police groups engage in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherm</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/08/23/montebello-bootgate-police-admit-they-were-among-protesters/#comment-91731</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=3363#comment-91731</guid>
		<description>Ha ha ha...

I shouldn't laugh, but the fact they were exposed and were so inept is funny.

What bothers me is that they did appear to try to incite violence by carrying rocks.  The protesters were middle-aged, middle-class boomers - they picked the wrong crowd.   With only four arrests during the summit, the 'violence' that was expected just wasn't that violent.

Furthermore - is the Quebec force taking the heat for someone higher up?

Hurray for YouTube - it is changing democracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha&#8230;</p>
<p>I shouldn&#8217;t laugh, but the fact they were exposed and were so inept is funny.</p>
<p>What bothers me is that they did appear to try to incite violence by carrying rocks.  The protesters were middle-aged, middle-class boomers - they picked the wrong crowd.   With only four arrests during the summit, the &#8216;violence&#8217; that was expected just wasn&#8217;t that violent.</p>
<p>Furthermore - is the Quebec force taking the heat for someone higher up?</p>
<p>Hurray for YouTube - it is changing democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RossK</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/08/23/montebello-bootgate-police-admit-they-were-among-protesters/#comment-91719</link>
		<dc:creator>RossK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=3363#comment-91719</guid>
		<description>Dr. Dawg--

According to David Akin, in his CTV report Wednesday, yes it did take place in the Green Zone. He made a specific point about that to the anchormodel.

I think that could mean something, don't you think, about intentions, etc?

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Dawg&#8211;</p>
<p>According to David Akin, in his CTV report Wednesday, yes it did take place in the Green Zone. He made a specific point about that to the anchormodel.</p>
<p>I think that could mean something, don&#8217;t you think, about intentions, etc?</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.Dawg</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/08/23/montebello-bootgate-police-admit-they-were-among-protesters/#comment-91714</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Dawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=3363#comment-91714</guid>
		<description>Essentially, the cops are claiming that they were identified by the protesters when they refused to throw their rocks.

Here's what's unclear to me. They were deep in the Green Zone at the time, some distance from the hotel. What rock-throwing was taking place in the vicinity? And if they were there to ensure non-violence, as is now being claimed. why didn't they arrest the kids throwing the rocks, if throw the rocks they did? Instead they ran away. Does this seem likely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Essentially, the cops are claiming that they were identified by the protesters when they refused to throw their rocks.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s unclear to me. They were deep in the Green Zone at the time, some distance from the hotel. What rock-throwing was taking place in the vicinity? And if they were there to ensure non-violence, as is now being claimed. why didn&#8217;t they arrest the kids throwing the rocks, if throw the rocks they did? Instead they ran away. Does this seem likely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BD</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/08/23/montebello-bootgate-police-admit-they-were-among-protesters/#comment-91713</link>
		<dc:creator>BD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=3363#comment-91713</guid>
		<description>"The police officers were located by the demonstrators at the time when they refused to launch projectiles."

Or some such thing.:^)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The police officers were located by the demonstrators at the time when they refused to launch projectiles.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or some such thing.:^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RossK</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/08/23/montebello-bootgate-police-admit-they-were-among-protesters/#comment-91711</link>
		<dc:creator>RossK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=3363#comment-91711</guid>
		<description>And one of the things I find interesting in the official Surete communique is the suggestion that their non-provocative agents of provocativeness carry projectiles but do not launch them.

Or some such thing.

(it's up at my place with a bad translation).

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And one of the things I find interesting in the official Surete communique is the suggestion that their non-provocative agents of provocativeness carry projectiles but do not launch them.</p>
<p>Or some such thing.</p>
<p>(it&#8217;s up at my place with a bad translation).</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
