<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservative Canadian Anglicans ready to make their move</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/11/19/conservative-canadian-anglicans-ready-to-make-their-move/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/11/19/conservative-canadian-anglicans-ready-to-make-their-move/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bene Diction</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/11/19/conservative-canadian-anglicans-ready-to-make-their-move/#comment-95724</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene Diction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=3509#comment-95724</guid>
		<description>Yes,  well said - not so more. I think we are in a time of splits, disagreements and tribalism and it may take awhile to swing back to denominations that tolerate wide ranges of teritary views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes,  well said - not so more. I think we are in a time of splits, disagreements and tribalism and it may take awhile to swing back to denominations that tolerate wide ranges of teritary views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2007/11/19/conservative-canadian-anglicans-ready-to-make-their-move/#comment-95707</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=3509#comment-95707</guid>
		<description>One of the things that I appreciated about many mainline denominations is the wide range of views that were tolerated. You could have Anglicans or Presbyterians or Lutherans with varying perspectives. Not so much anymore, on with the ideological purity tests!

Sigh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that I appreciated about many mainline denominations is the wide range of views that were tolerated. You could have Anglicans or Presbyterians or Lutherans with varying perspectives. Not so much anymore, on with the ideological purity tests!</p>
<p>Sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
