“Canadian authorities were informed on November 5, 2007, by Canada’s monitoring team, of a credible allegation of mistreatment pertaining to one Canadian-transferred detainee held in an Afghan detention facility,” wrote senior counsel J. Sanderson Graham. “As a consequence there have been no transfers of detainees to Afghan authorities since that date. The allegation is under investigation by the Afghan authorities. Canada will resume transferring detainees when it believes it can do so in accordance with its international legal obligations.
Last year the federal government said torture of prisoners didn’t happen. Then the Canadian public was told there was no credible information Afghan detainees being handed over by Canadian troops were being tortured, then told steps were being taken to see prisoners weren’t tortured.
Shortly after, voters heard a Monitoring Agreement was set up with the Afghan government.
It didn’t work.
While I can commend the federal government for finally stopping the transfer of prisoners to Afghan authorities, what we aren’t being told is how many Afghanis have been captured by Canadian military since this November decision, where they are being held, and what the charges are.
While this information is public because of legal action by Amnesty International and the B.C. Civil Liberties Union, I fail to see why this has been kept secret. Initially the federal government protested too much. We don’t know how many Afghani’s were tortured after being handed over by Canadian troops.
This has been profound insult to the Canadian military and their goals. If they are now able to do thier jobs without having to wonder about who is getting tortured as a direct result of military taking prisoners, good.
Torture is torture, no matter how the Maxime Berniers in our government dance around semantics.
While opposition parties were treated disgracefully when the initial information came out last year, it is our troops that faced the hardships knowing doing their jobs put Afghanis in further danger. We have been silent, and complicit.
We knew a corrupt Afghan goverment tortured, we’ve known the US tortured. While our troops wished to honour human rights and the Geneva Convention in a lawless, corrupt narco-state, human rights were not honoured, and it is not the fault of our troops. Globe and Mail:
Published 7 months, 1 week agoThe government kept the its decision under wraps, even as it prepared to fight rights groups seeking a halt to transfers and as it tried to drum up public support for extending Canada’s commitment to wage war on the Taliban in southern Afghanistan.

You are currently browsing the Bene Diction Blogs On weblog archives.
For blog design, Wordpress or MovableType coding or blog consulting, see cre8d design.
Whooee! It used to be a trick question when someone asked, “Have you stopped beating your wife yet?”
Now, Harper is asked, “Have you stopped violating the Geneva conventions yet?”
Answer: “Yes. We stopped back in early November 2007.”
Shameful and shameless.
I also wonder what we’ve been doing with detainees since November but I also wonder something else. Now that we’ve confirmed what the opposition was saying all along, what steps have been taken to ascertain what has become of detainees handed over before November?
Knowingly violating the Geneva Conventions is a war crime. Turning a blind eye to torture is a violation. Delivering prisoners to known torturers is a violation. Nevermind an election. Harper, Hillier, O’Connor, MacKay and Bernier should be put on trial.
Canadians should be ashamed of what’s been done in our name.
JB
Yes, every Canadian should be ashamed, I’m angry.
Your question is one I sorely missed - “What happened to the men and women Canadian troops handed over before November?
Thank you.
If Afghans are being turned over to their government, they are being tortured. If the are being turned over to the US, they are being tortured. That has been known since 2004.