<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deceptions about sexual orientation harder to broadcast in Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/04/09/deceptions-about-sexual-orientation-harder-to-broadcast-in-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/04/09/deceptions-about-sexual-orientation-harder-to-broadcast-in-canada/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grog</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/04/09/deceptions-about-sexual-orientation-harder-to-broadcast-in-canada/#comment-103040</link>
		<dc:creator>Grog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/04/09/deceptions-about-sexual-orientation-harder-to-broadcast-in-canada/#comment-103040</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

I'm sorry to say it, but so much of what comes out of both WND and FOTF is miles from anything resembling legitimate "religious expression".  

The disappointing part with this most recent pack of lies is in the blatant distortion they rely upon.  Given the exemptions expressed in Canadian law for religious discussion of matters, one has to imagine that either WND and FOTF are lying through their teeth, outrageously ignorant of Canadian law, or &lt;a href="http://crystalgaze2.blogspot.com/2008/03/dear-fundagelicals.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;knowingly authoring hate messages&lt;/a&gt; against GLBT people.  

I do find Benediction's characterization of Dobson's organization as a 'corporation that lost its way' intriguingly accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry to say it, but so much of what comes out of both WND and FOTF is miles from anything resembling legitimate &#8220;religious expression&#8221;.  </p>
<p>The disappointing part with this most recent pack of lies is in the blatant distortion they rely upon.  Given the exemptions expressed in Canadian law for religious discussion of matters, one has to imagine that either WND and FOTF are lying through their teeth, outrageously ignorant of Canadian law, or <a href="http://crystalgaze2.blogspot.com/2008/03/dear-fundagelicals.html" rel="nofollow">knowingly authoring hate messages</a> against GLBT people.  </p>
<p>I do find Benediction&#8217;s characterization of Dobson&#8217;s organization as a &#8216;corporation that lost its way&#8217; intriguingly accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bene Diction</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/04/09/deceptions-about-sexual-orientation-harder-to-broadcast-in-canada/#comment-103033</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene Diction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/04/09/deceptions-about-sexual-orientation-harder-to-broadcast-in-canada/#comment-103033</guid>
		<description>It's not a benediction Kevin. 
It is a rant against a corporation that lost it's way a long time ago.

As for being ill-informed - tell me what is factually incorrect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a benediction Kevin.<br />
It is a rant against a corporation that lost it&#8217;s way a long time ago.</p>
<p>As for being ill-informed - tell me what is factually incorrect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/04/09/deceptions-about-sexual-orientation-harder-to-broadcast-in-canada/#comment-103031</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/04/09/deceptions-about-sexual-orientation-harder-to-broadcast-in-canada/#comment-103031</guid>
		<description>Would you regard this post as being a benediction? It seemed like an angry ill-informed rant which reveals a prejudice against a particular religious expression. 

But thats just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you regard this post as being a benediction? It seemed like an angry ill-informed rant which reveals a prejudice against a particular religious expression. </p>
<p>But thats just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
