I just wonder why the Church–as a body corporate–doesn’t
tell the magazine to stop using such a misleading word and
bringing shame to the Church.

I can’t believe some of the writing in that periodical.
Compared to periodicals of other churches, I find it a pandering
and propagandistic work–for want of a better word.

Perhaps it needs to reorganise itself and bring in a broader
spectrum of contributors and also try to keep opinion out
of reportage.

Until then, it’s not worth the read.