<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/09/15/sarah-palin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/09/15/sarah-palin/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Byron</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/09/15/sarah-palin/#comment-109340</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=4328#comment-109340</guid>
		<description>Good to see you addressing Palin directly rather than dissing her more dominionist backers. Interesting post that will elicit a reply in short order; it merits more than a comment here.

"Westbrook Pegler." I'm fairly well read, but this is the first time I've heard of the guy, even as a passing reference. According to Pegler's Wikipedia, he died in 1969 when I was 7 and Palin was probably on a tricycle. He seems like Pat Buchanan on a bender, a rather nasty chap who'd have a very limited following today.

The quote she borrowed seems OK, even if the person her speech-writer borrowed it from seems obnoxious.

There's an old saying-"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." Or at least ignorance.

I would not have picked Pegler's name out of a lineup 15 minute ago, nor recognize that a quote came from him without Googling it. Palin has a Poli-Sci background in college, but her classes at Idaho in the mid 80s were likely as Pegler free as my early 80s Poli-Sci classes at Central Michigan, so she was probably as clueless about Pegler as I am, at least until last week when this started to get into the news; I hadn't heard of this until today.

Probably...however, her husband leans a bit to the Buchanan side of politics, so it may have came in via him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you addressing Palin directly rather than dissing her more dominionist backers. Interesting post that will elicit a reply in short order; it merits more than a comment here.</p>
<p>&#8220;Westbrook Pegler.&#8221; I&#8217;m fairly well read, but this is the first time I&#8217;ve heard of the guy, even as a passing reference. According to Pegler&#8217;s Wikipedia, he died in 1969 when I was 7 and Palin was probably on a tricycle. He seems like Pat Buchanan on a bender, a rather nasty chap who&#8217;d have a very limited following today.</p>
<p>The quote she borrowed seems OK, even if the person her speech-writer borrowed it from seems obnoxious.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an old saying-&#8221;Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.&#8221; Or at least ignorance.</p>
<p>I would not have picked Pegler&#8217;s name out of a lineup 15 minute ago, nor recognize that a quote came from him without Googling it. Palin has a Poli-Sci background in college, but her classes at Idaho in the mid 80s were likely as Pegler free as my early 80s Poli-Sci classes at Central Michigan, so she was probably as clueless about Pegler as I am, at least until last week when this started to get into the news; I hadn&#8217;t heard of this until today.</p>
<p>Probably&#8230;however, her husband leans a bit to the Buchanan side of politics, so it may have came in via him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
