<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservative Party of Canada taped opposition call</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:13:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bene D</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/comment-page-1/#comment-109674</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=4720#comment-109674</guid>
		<description>Okay Zero. 
I think you are trying to say the NDP gave permission to release the call.

I can see a typo being made - the J (John) and the L (Linda) are close together on the keyboard.

Are you sayiing Mr. Duncan was invited to the call, logged in, gave his name and the password and informed the NDP he was taping?

I can see the NDP caucus taping their own call.
Why would the NDP tell John Duncan (give permission) to tape away and then release it to the PMO?

Another question for you: Is a federal caucus conversation priviledged communication?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay Zero.<br />
I think you are trying to say the NDP gave permission to release the call.</p>
<p>I can see a typo being made &#8211; the J (John) and the L (Linda) are close together on the keyboard.</p>
<p>Are you sayiing Mr. Duncan was invited to the call, logged in, gave his name and the password and informed the NDP he was taping?</p>
<p>I can see the NDP caucus taping their own call.<br />
Why would the NDP tell John Duncan (give permission) to tape away and then release it to the PMO?</p>
<p>Another question for you: Is a federal caucus conversation priviledged communication?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zero</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/comment-page-1/#comment-109672</link>
		<dc:creator>Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=4720#comment-109672</guid>
		<description>Paragraph 184.2 , subsection (1) of the criminal code of Canada states:

Interception with consent

184.2 (1) A person may intercept, by means of any electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device, a private communication where either the originator of the private communication or the person intended by the originator to receive it has consented to the interception and an authorization has been obtained pursuant to subsection (3). 


Found at http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-46/bo-ga:l_VI-gb:s_184//en#anchorbo-ga:l_VI-gb:s_184</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paragraph 184.2 , subsection (1) of the criminal code of Canada states:</p>
<p>Interception with consent</p>
<p>184.2 (1) A person may intercept, by means of any electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device, a private communication where either the originator of the private communication or the person intended by the originator to receive it has consented to the interception and an authorization has been obtained pursuant to subsection (3). </p>
<p>Found at <a href="http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-46/bo-ga:l_VI-gb:s_184//en#anchorbo-ga:l_VI-gb:s_184" rel="nofollow">http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-46/bo-ga:l_VI-gb:s_184//en#anchorbo-ga:l_VI-gb:s_184</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bene D</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/comment-page-1/#comment-109656</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=4720#comment-109656</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that MgS, the PM has a decision to make, carry on or prorogue. We&#039;ll see soon enough if it&#039;s just rumour or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that MgS, the PM has a decision to make, carry on or prorogue. We&#8217;ll see soon enough if it&#8217;s just rumour or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MgS</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/comment-page-1/#comment-109655</link>
		<dc:creator>MgS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=4720#comment-109655</guid>
		<description>This simply shows that HarperCo is taking their tactics from the BushCo playbook - ethics, morals and respect for the opposition be damned.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2008/11/30/caucus-confidential/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rumors are now swirling that he is planning to prorogue parliament rather than face a confidence motion&lt;/a&gt;.  This is a Prime Minister desperate to hang on to power for the sake of power, not for the sake of Canada and Canadians.

It is time for him to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This simply shows that HarperCo is taking their tactics from the BushCo playbook &#8211; ethics, morals and respect for the opposition be damned.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.garth.ca/weblog/2008/11/30/caucus-confidential/" rel="nofollow">Rumors are now swirling that he is planning to prorogue parliament rather than face a confidence motion</a>.  This is a Prime Minister desperate to hang on to power for the sake of power, not for the sake of Canada and Canadians.</p>
<p>It is time for him to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bene Diction</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/comment-page-1/#comment-109654</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene Diction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=4720#comment-109654</guid>
		<description>September 9, 2004 Layton, Harper and Duceppe as leaders of the Opposition wrote the Governor General of Canada:

&quot;As leaders of the opposition parties, we are well aware that, given the Liberal minority government, you could be asked by the Prime Minister to dissolve the 38th Parliament at any time should the House of Commons fail to support some part of the government’s program. We respectfully point out that the opposition parties, who together constitute a majority in the House, have been in close consultation. We believe that, should a request for dissolution arise this should give you cause, as constitutional practice has determined, to consult the opposition leaders and consider all of your options before exercising your constitutional authority. Your attention to this matter is appreciated.&quot;

The Prime Minister of Canada&#039;s office did not tape and release transcripts of  caucus meetings of the then opposition parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>September 9, 2004 Layton, Harper and Duceppe as leaders of the Opposition wrote the Governor General of Canada:</p>
<p>&#8220;As leaders of the opposition parties, we are well aware that, given the Liberal minority government, you could be asked by the Prime Minister to dissolve the 38th Parliament at any time should the House of Commons fail to support some part of the government’s program. We respectfully point out that the opposition parties, who together constitute a majority in the House, have been in close consultation. We believe that, should a request for dissolution arise this should give you cause, as constitutional practice has determined, to consult the opposition leaders and consider all of your options before exercising your constitutional authority. Your attention to this matter is appreciated.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Prime Minister of Canada&#8217;s office did not tape and release transcripts of  caucus meetings of the then opposition parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherm</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/comment-page-1/#comment-109653</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=4720#comment-109653</guid>
		<description>This is unbelievable - sinc when is the Conservative party above the law? 

I&#039;m with you Hamster - Rick Mercer for PM.

No more Harper(gate).  When do the attack ads start?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is unbelievable &#8211; sinc when is the Conservative party above the law? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you Hamster &#8211; Rick Mercer for PM.</p>
<p>No more Harper(gate).  When do the attack ads start?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bene D</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/comment-page-1/#comment-109652</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=4720#comment-109652</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s reverse it. 

A Liberal, NDP or Bloq staffer gets inadvertently invited onto a Conservative caucus conference call, tapes it and releases through the office of the offical Opposition.

It would be illegal. 
It would be ethically and morally just as wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s reverse it. </p>
<p>A Liberal, NDP or Bloq staffer gets inadvertently invited onto a Conservative caucus conference call, tapes it and releases through the office of the offical Opposition.</p>
<p>It would be illegal.<br />
It would be ethically and morally just as wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bene Diction</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/comment-page-1/#comment-109651</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene Diction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=4720#comment-109651</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m angry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m angry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamster</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/comment-page-1/#comment-109650</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=4720#comment-109650</guid>
		<description>Bene, its just the politicians proving that they can&#039;t be trusted.
ANY OF THEM.
ALL OF THEM.
The only good politician is a retired one.
Of course, then they become a lobbyist.
BAH HUMBUG!
.
.
.
.

I&#039;d vote for Rick Mercer.
Have a good day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bene, its just the politicians proving that they can&#8217;t be trusted.<br />
ANY OF THEM.<br />
ALL OF THEM.<br />
The only good politician is a retired one.<br />
Of course, then they become a lobbyist.<br />
BAH HUMBUG!<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d vote for Rick Mercer.<br />
Have a good day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tee Hee</title>
		<link>http://www.benedictionblogson.com/2008/11/30/conservative-party-of-canada-taped-opposition-call/comment-page-1/#comment-109649</link>
		<dc:creator>Tee Hee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benedictionblogson.com/?p=4720#comment-109649</guid>
		<description>The issue seems to be that a Tory staffer was mistakenly invited into this call. It is obvious to anyone with common sense that this staffer should have known they were invited in error.  I am assuming the invitation and code was sent in an e-mail and then the Tory called in.  Undoubtedly, they did not identify themselves on the call.  It should be asked of the NDP whether they did a roll call.  

Regardless of the legal implications, the staffer took the unethical move of calling to observe on a call they had no right to be part of.  If I am to hazard a guess I will say that the Tories will have the staffer fall on their sword - as is their way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue seems to be that a Tory staffer was mistakenly invited into this call. It is obvious to anyone with common sense that this staffer should have known they were invited in error.  I am assuming the invitation and code was sent in an e-mail and then the Tory called in.  Undoubtedly, they did not identify themselves on the call.  It should be asked of the NDP whether they did a roll call.  </p>
<p>Regardless of the legal implications, the staffer took the unethical move of calling to observe on a call they had no right to be part of.  If I am to hazard a guess I will say that the Tories will have the staffer fall on their sword &#8211; as is their way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
